<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Modifications and Re-Applications of Narrative Theory</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hannahcrumme.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hannahcrumme.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>Shakespeare Thesis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2007 23:21:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Chapters by thesisnonsense08</title>
		<link>http://hannahcrumme.wordpress.com/2007/10/30/chapters/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>thesisnonsense08</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2007 23:21:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hannahcrumme.wordpress.com/2007/10/30/chapters/#comment-4</guid>
		<description>Hannah, after thinking more about your draft, I returned to look at your chapters. I&#039;m wondering--Does having an entire chapter on curses make sense? Could it be worked entirely into the Richard III chapter? Perhaps making Richard III more of a way of introducing the concept of curses could be effective. It would allow you to move away from defining the nature of tragedy, which seemed to come up as problematic in class. Just a thought--perhaps too big of one. Good luck!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hannah, after thinking more about your draft, I returned to look at your chapters. I&#8217;m wondering&#8211;Does having an entire chapter on curses make sense? Could it be worked entirely into the Richard III chapter? Perhaps making Richard III more of a way of introducing the concept of curses could be effective. It would allow you to move away from defining the nature of tragedy, which seemed to come up as problematic in class. Just a thought&#8211;perhaps too big of one. Good luck!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Narrative Theory by DR</title>
		<link>http://hannahcrumme.wordpress.com/2007/09/09/narrative-theory/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>DR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2007 03:47:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hannahcrumme.wordpress.com/2007/09/09/narrative-theory/#comment-2</guid>
		<description>Have you looked at Michael McKeon&#039;s _Theory of the Novel_ at all?  While it&#039;s primarily concerned with distinguishing novel theory from narrative theory writ large, it&#039;s an incredibly rich anthology.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you looked at Michael McKeon&#8217;s _Theory of the Novel_ at all?  While it&#8217;s primarily concerned with distinguishing novel theory from narrative theory writ large, it&#8217;s an incredibly rich anthology.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
